comp.object.corba feed

Syndicate content
OMG CORBA standard.
Updated: 42 weeks 6 days ago

Re: [ANN] IDL to C++11 recommended for adoption by the OMG

Fri, 2013-03-29 19:00
For a better understanding I can reccommend this article:

<[link]>

Maybe different implementations of std::array do here a better job. But
after measuring with GCC, that after optimization usually there is no
difference in performance, I'm not interested any more ;-)

Categories: CORBA

Re: [ANN] IDL to C++11 recommended for adoption by the OMG

Tue, 2013-03-26 11:00
Hi,

The IDL length limited is just a max, the array would always fully
allocate it, which could be something you don't want. Hopefully at some
point we can standardize some IDL annotations that you can use to
control the mapping as user, override the default

Not sure, that is up to each product/vendor to decide. We are working on

Categories: CORBA

Re: [ANN] IDL to C++11 recommended for adoption by the OMG

Thu, 2013-03-14 10:00
Indeed, I agree. The current C++ language mapping is "rotten". I browsed
a little bit in the new mapping and it seems rather canonical.

I wonder a little bit why length-limited sequences do not map to
length-limited types instead of vector, though, e.g. std:array or plain
arrays.

BTW, does anyone have an idea whether or when omniorb will support the

Categories: CORBA

Re: [ANN] IDL to C++11 recommended for adoption by the OMG

Wed, 2013-03-06 18:00
Hi,

Thanks for your comment. We are in the final steps of finishing our
TAOX11 product which implements this new language mapping for the TAO
CORBA implementation. We are also going to work on a CIAOX11 which will
be a CCM product matching the CIAO open source product and OpenDDSX11
which will be OpenDDS with this new language mapping.

Categories: CORBA

Re: [ANN] IDL to C++11 recommended for adoption by the OMG

Fri, 2013-03-01 09:00
Thank you for your work! This is really needed.

Yours,
VB.
--
"If /dev/null is fast in web scale I will use it."

[link]

Categories: CORBA